Wikipedia all geared up to challenge Google
January 21, 2007
Wikipedia ,the world's leading online encyclopedia, is all set to launch its own search engine and challenge the giant ,Google.
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has said that its upcoming search engine - codenamed Wikiasari - will use the same user-driven technologies as Wikipedia, which allows anyone with an internet connection to create and edit entries.Mr Wales said this focus on human judgment was far more effective than using computer algorithms such as those adopted by Google.
In deciding how high up a particular link appears on a search query, Google's algorithms rank sites based on how many other websites link to it.
Mr Wales' approach, however, is to use the method that has to date proved so successful for Wikipedia - let humans pick the sites that are most relevant to particular queries..
But while this approach may increase the relevance of search results, as with all user-driven web initiatives, it would open the service up to unintended manipulation.
Wikipedia, for example, has come under fire on numerous occasions this year for plagiarism and publishing inaccurate information. This sort of vandalism is difficult to remove until after it has been spotted by other users.
It is unclear how Mr Wales plans to deter vandals who would seek to manipulate Wikiasari's search rankings, but the incentive to do so is undoubtedly present.
The project is scheduled to publicly launch next year, aided in part by financial backing from online retailer Amazon. But despite being an investor, Amazon will not be involved in developing or running the search engine.
I feel that it is a very strong step that is being taken by Wikipedia.If successful it would do wonders for them and will most certainly give Goolge a run for their money.If not,Wikipedia will have to pay up for the consequences.It is indeed a Gamble!!!!!!
What do you feel ?Comments will be appreciated.
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has said that its upcoming search engine - codenamed Wikiasari - will use the same user-driven technologies as Wikipedia, which allows anyone with an internet connection to create and edit entries.Mr Wales said this focus on human judgment was far more effective than using computer algorithms such as those adopted by Google.
In deciding how high up a particular link appears on a search query, Google's algorithms rank sites based on how many other websites link to it.
Mr Wales' approach, however, is to use the method that has to date proved so successful for Wikipedia - let humans pick the sites that are most relevant to particular queries..
But while this approach may increase the relevance of search results, as with all user-driven web initiatives, it would open the service up to unintended manipulation.
Wikipedia, for example, has come under fire on numerous occasions this year for plagiarism and publishing inaccurate information. This sort of vandalism is difficult to remove until after it has been spotted by other users.
It is unclear how Mr Wales plans to deter vandals who would seek to manipulate Wikiasari's search rankings, but the incentive to do so is undoubtedly present.
The project is scheduled to publicly launch next year, aided in part by financial backing from online retailer Amazon. But despite being an investor, Amazon will not be involved in developing or running the search engine.
I feel that it is a very strong step that is being taken by Wikipedia.If successful it would do wonders for them and will most certainly give Goolge a run for their money.If not,Wikipedia will have to pay up for the consequences.It is indeed a Gamble!!!!!!
What do you feel ?Comments will be appreciated.
Bookmark: || BlinkList || del.icio.us || Digg it || Furl || reddit || Simpy || Spurl || Yahoo MyWeb








That's good move by Wikipedia... but Wikipedia has PR9 now... and have you heard of the recent campaign to reduce the PR of Wikipedia by using rel=nofollow?
Check this out...
http://jesse-wright.com/2007/01/23/a-campaign-to-reduce-the-page-rank-of-wikipedia/